指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 指标 ↑.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #412 | Ling 3.0 Tiny low | Inclusionai | 0.7 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 3.09s |
| #413 | Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Inclusionai | 0.7 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 3.00s |
| #411 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 0.7 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 3.10s |
| #366 | Hy4 preview none | Tencent | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.165 | 1/2 | 47.9s |
| #199 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 0.7 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 1/2 | 33.4s |
| #298 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next none | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.6 | ~$0.011 | 1/2 | 612ms |
| #334 | GPT-5.6 Luna none | OpenAI | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.042 | 1/2 | 1.23s |
| #147 | GPT-6 Luna low | OpenAI | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.033 | 1/2 | 17.4s |
| #318 | Nemotron 3 Super medium | NVIDIA | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.081 | 1/2 | 6.97s |
| #432 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30b A3b Reasoning medium | NVIDIA | 0.7 | 0.3 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 1.37s |
| #74 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $0.885 | 1/2 | 5.42s |
| #63 | Muse Spark Open medium | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.260 | 1/2 | 18.4s |
| #165 | Claude Fable 5.1 medium | Anthropic | 0.7 | 0.7 | $3.197 | 1/2 | 5.77s |
| #192 | Step 5 Preview high | Stepfun | 0.7 | 0.7 | $4.513 | 1/2 | 20.5s |
| #346 | Mistral Small 4 medium | Mistral | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.126 | 1/2 | 1.38s |