领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 测试正确 ↑.
316/316
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #40 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 7.7 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 2/3 | 1.19s |
| #57 | Claude Fable 5.1 medium | Anthropic | 7.7 | 8.3 | $2.909 | 2/3 | 19.3s |
| #64 | Inkling high | Thinkingmachines | 7.7 | 8.0 | $1.046 | 2/3 | 174.7s |
| #106 | Qwen3.7 Max none | Qwen | 7.7 | 7.4 | $0.197 | 2/3 | 1.24s |
| #113 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 7.7 | 7.3 | $0.661 | 2/3 | 2.27s |
| #153 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 7.7 | 6.8 | $0.085 | 2/3 | 879ms | |
| #155 | GLM 5.2 none | Z.ai | 7.7 | 6.7 | $0.153 | 2/3 | 6.35s |
| #158 | Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal | 7.7 | 6.7 | $0.300 | 2/3 | 879ms | |
| #161 | Claude Opus 4.7 none | Anthropic | 7.7 | 6.6 | $0.505 | 2/3 | 1.19s |
| #164 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 7.7 | 6.6 | $0.646 | 2/3 | 2.10s | |
| #166 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 7.7 | 6.6 | $0.621 | 2/3 | 1.44s | |
| #169 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none | Qwen | 7.7 | 6.6 | $0.073 | 2/3 | 1.24s |
| #213 | Seed 2.1 Turbo none | Bytedance Seed | 7.7 | 5.9 | $0.092 | 2/3 | 1.36s |
| #234 | Qwen3.6 27B none | Qwen | 7.7 | 5.5 | $0.062 | 2/3 | 2.79s |
| #236 | Qwen3.8 27B none | Qwen | 7.7 | 5.5 | ~$0.006 | 2/3 | 552ms |