反AI技巧 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 反AI技巧 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
461/461
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 反AI技巧 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #165 | Grok 4.7 low | X AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.933 | 4/4 | 9.92s |
| #60 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $2.018 | 2/4 | 6.00s |
| #76 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 0.8 | 0.9 | $2.042 | 3/4 | 28.2s |
| #384 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 0.9 | 0.5 | $2.044 | 3/4 | 37.2s | |
| #50 | Muse Spark Open xhigh | Meta | 0.9 | 0.9 | $2.081 | 3/4 | 20.1s |
| #251 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 0.7 | 0.6 | $2.126 | 2/4 | 2.98s |
| #28 | Claude Opus 5.5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.133 | 4/4 | 12.6s |
| #14 | GPT-6 Astra low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $2.160 | 4/4 | 2.05s |
| #27 | GPT-6.1 Terra max | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.209 | 4/4 | 4.49s |
| #67 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 0.8 | 0.9 | $2.213 | 3/4 | 4.11s |
| #139 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.270 | 4/4 | 10.8s |
| #401 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 0.8 | 0.4 | $2.310 | 3/3 | 43.9s | |
| #209 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 0.7 | 0.7 | $2.334 | 2/4 | 3.40s |
| #56 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.350 | 4/4 | 4.32s |
| #205 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 0.9 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 3/4 | 24.0s |