AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#130

Trinity Large Preview

Arcee AI Release: 2026-01-27 Tested on: 2026-05-08 15:30 arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview::none

Summary

Trinity Large Preview scores 4.8 on AI BENCHY and ranks #130. It has 10.0 reliability, a 26.3% pass rate, $0.001 total cost, and 3.03s average response time.

What makes Trinity Large Preview unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #2, while Anti-AI Tricks is its weakest area at #14.

Score

4.8

Consistency

8.9

Total Output Tokens

2,190

Total Input Tokens

0

Input Price

$0.150 / 1M

Output Price

$0.450 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 15

Attempt pass rate: 26.3%

Flaky tests

3

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

3.03s

Response Time (max): 14.34s

Response Time (total): 57.60s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#130 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-06-04 14:30 New test added 4.8 10.0 $0.008 Compare
2026-05-22 00:42 Suite changed 4.8 10.0 $0.001 Compare
2026-05-08 15:30 Suite changed 4.8 10.0 $0.001 Current run
2026-04-23 10:54 First recorded run 5.3 N/A $0.000 Compare

This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 3.1 10.0
Coding 4.9 3.2
Combined 3.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 5.3 10.0
General Intelligence 4.5 10.0
Instructions following 3.4 6.2
Puzzle Solving 3.6 7.7
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models