- Peringkat
- #73
- Total token output
- 433,733
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 106.09s
- Total Biaya
- $2.254
Grok 4.7 (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (high)
Grok 4.7 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.1 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.799 vs $2.254. GLM 5.2 (high) lebih cepat di 69.86s vs 106.09s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 81.8% vs 69.7%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #78
- Total token output
- 364,655
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 69.86s
- Total Biaya
- $0.799
Model yang direkomendasikan
GLM 5.2 (high)
Its score stays close to the best score here (8.0 vs 8.1), while costing about 2.8x less than Grok 4.7 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Grok 4.7 Grok 4.7 medium | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.1 | 8.0 |
| Peringkat | #73 | #78 |
| Keandalan | 9.9 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 81.8% | 69.7% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 5 | 3 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 15.023 | 6.849 |
| Total Biaya | $2.254 | $0.799 |
| Harga input | $1.600 / 1M | $0.650 / 1M |
| Harga output | $4.800 / 1M | $2.042 / 1M |
| Total token input | 107,193 | 83,822 |
| Token output | 4,661 | 72,040 |
| Token penalaran | 429,072 | 292,615 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 106.09s | 69.86s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 660.89s | 599.43s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 2333.94s | 1536.98s |
| Parameter | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#73 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7
medium- Biaya
- $0.047
- Waktu
- 132.3s
- Token
- 9,954 tok
#78 GLM 5.2
high
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
InklinghighvsGrok 4.7mediumMuse Spark 1.1highvsGrok 4.7mediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowvsGLM 5.2highDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowvsGrok 4.7mediumMuse Glimmer 30BxhighvsGrok 4.7mediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731highvsGrok 4.7mediumInklingmediumvsGLM 5.2highQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowvsGrok 4.7mediumGrok 4.7lowvsGLM 5.2highKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2highGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGLM 5.2highStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2high