- Peringkat
- #81
- Total token output
- 231,848
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 59.02s
- Total Biaya
- $1.320
Grok 4.7 (low) vs GLM 5.2 (high)
GLM 5.2 (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.0 vs 7.9. GLM 5.2 (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.799 vs $1.320. Grok 4.7 (low) lebih cepat di 59.02s vs 69.86s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 77.3% vs 69.7%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #78
- Total token output
- 364,655
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 69.86s
- Total Biaya
- $0.799
Model yang direkomendasikan
GLM 5.2 (high)
It has the best score here (8.0), while costing about 1.7x less than Grok 4.7 (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Grok 4.7 Grok 4.7 low | GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.9 | 8.0 |
| Peringkat | #81 | #78 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 77.3% | 69.7% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 5 | 3 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 9.422 | 6.849 |
| Total Biaya | $1.320 | $0.799 |
| Harga input | $1.600 / 1M | $0.650 / 1M |
| Harga output | $4.800 / 1M | $2.042 / 1M |
| Total token input | 128,832 | 83,822 |
| Token output | 6,840 | 72,040 |
| Token penalaran | 225,008 | 292,615 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 59.02s | 69.86s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 389.63s | 599.43s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1298.42s | 1536.98s |
| Parameter | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#81 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7
low- Biaya
- $0.007
- Waktu
- 15.2s
- Token
- 1,537 tok
#78 GLM 5.2
high
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Kimi K3maxvsGrok 4.7lowGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGrok 4.7lowStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.7lowGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsGrok 4.7lowDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowvsGLM 5.2highInklingmediumvsGrok 4.7lowInklingmediumvsGLM 5.2highGrok 4.7mediumvsGLM 5.2highQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGrok 4.7lowKimi K3maxvsGLM 5.2highGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGLM 5.2highStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2high