Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 5.4 vs 5.3. Qwen3.6 35B A3B memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.061 vs $0.127. Qwen3.6 35B A3B lebih cepat di 5.52s vs 111.61s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 27.3% vs 31.8%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.6 35B A3BIt has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 2.1x less than Laguna S 2.1 (high).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-22

Metrik Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 high Rilis: 2026-07-21 Tersedia gratis Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Rilis: 2026-04-20
Skor 5.4 5.3
Peringkat #167 #169
Keandalan 9.9 10.0
Konsistensi 8.1 7.7
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 27.3% 31.8%
Tes tidak stabil 5 6
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 3.153 1.496
Total Biaya $0.127 $0.061
Harga input $0.100 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Harga output $0.200 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total token input 208,931 93,979
Token output 175,588 46,957
Token penalaran 409,276 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 111.61s 5.52s
Waktu respons (maks) 1190.11s 39.54s
Waktu respons (total) 2455.39s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#167 Laguna S 2.1

high
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
6.8s
Token
1,389 tok

#169 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Biaya
$0.008
Waktu
30.1s
Token
6,317 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 271.42s 6,496 59,355 151,009
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan