- Peringkat
- #105
- Total token output
- 687,692
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 87.39s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash — high vs low
high unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.9 vs 6.3. Biaya benchmark hampir imbang di $0.000 vs $0.000. low lebih cepat di 85.22s vs 87.39s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 69.6% vs 66.7%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #222
- Total token output
- 704,170
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 85.22s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan
high
It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.9) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash high | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.9 | 6.3 |
| Peringkat | #105 | #222 |
| Keandalan | 9.8 | 9.7 |
| Konsistensi | 9.3 | 7.8 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 69.6% | 66.7% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 2 | 6 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Total Biaya | $0.000 | $0.000 |
| Harga input | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | T/A | T/A |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | T/A |
| Total token input | 324,691 | 271,890 |
| Token output | 181,251 | 190,841 |
| Token penalaran | 506,441 | 513,329 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 87.39s | 85.22s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 665.85s | 432.81s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 2010.08s | 1960.12s |
| Parameter | 560B total (25B aktif) | 560B total (25B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#105 Ling 3.1 Flash
high- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 181.1s
- Token
- 21,073 tok
#222 Ling 3.1 Flash
low- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 133.5s
- Token
- 12,950 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 87.42s | 204,838 | 9,381 | 8,546 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 101.51s | 148,137 | 12,034 | 14,574 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.44s | 750 | 1,219 | 3,505 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.16s | 750 | 1,268 | 3,167 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 83.41s | 8,298 | 17,470 | 54,626 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.6 | 4.2 | 66.7% | 2 | 107.30s | 8,298 | 20,816 | 86,330 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 351.19s | 90,556 | 44,145 | 153,951 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 235.14s | 95,366 | 29,960 | 91,357 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 17.38s | 8,016 | 1,517 | 3,710 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.83s | 8,016 | 1,507 | 4,078 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 222.88s | 837 | 94,527 | 212,965 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 274.59s | 837 | 118,155 | 260,533 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.9 | 9.4 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.82s | 546 | 38 | 2,140 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 11.47s | 546 | 10 | 2,835 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.31s | 744 | 349 | 1,746 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.82s | 744 | 324 | 1,374 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 37.46s | 747 | 5,017 | 29,548 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.9 | 7.8 | 88.9% | 1 | 32.80s | 747 | 4,505 | 31,642 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.8 | 2.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 38.25s | 9,131 | 2,943 | 9,161 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 24.17s | 8,221 | 884 | 6,373 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 81.83s | 228 | 4,645 | 26,543 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 40.69s | 228 | 1,378 | 11,066 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ling 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSolar Pro 4highLing 3.1 FlashhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumLing 3.1 FlashhighvsGrok 4.5mediumGemini 3.5 FlashmediumvsLing 3.1 FlashhighDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsLing 3.1 FlashlowLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneLing 3.1 FlashhighvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423nonevsLing 3.1 FlashlowLing 3.1 FlashlowvsGrok 4.20medium