- Peringkat
- #222
- Total token output
- 704,170
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 85.22s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash (low) vs Qwen3.6 27B
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.3 vs 6.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.147. Qwen3.6 27B lebih cepat di 12.71s vs 85.22s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 66.7% vs 47.8%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #216
- Total token output
- 20,816
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 12.71s
- Total Biaya
- $0.147
Model yang direkomendasikan
Qwen3.6 27B
It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 6.7x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash low | Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Peringkat | #222 | #216 |
| Keandalan | 9.7 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 66.7% | 47.8% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 6 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.000 | 1.874 |
| Total Biaya | $0.000 | $0.147 |
| Harga input | $0.000 / 1M | $0.320 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.000 / 1M | $3.200 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | T/A | T/A |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | T/A |
| Total token input | 271,890 | 250,919 |
| Token output | 190,841 | 20,816 |
| Token penalaran | 513,329 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 85.22s | 12.71s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 432.81s | 156.31s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1960.12s | 292.29s |
| Parameter | 560B total (25B aktif) | 27B |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#222 Ling 3.1 Flash
low- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 133.5s
- Token
- 12,950 tok
#216 Qwen3.6 27B
none- Biaya
- $0.009
- Waktu
- 83.0s
- Token
- 4,549 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 101.51s | 148,137 | 12,034 | 14,574 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 58.61s | 155,114 | 4,660 | 0 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.16s | 750 | 1,268 | 3,167 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 3.8 | 3.7 | 41.7% | 3 | 2.83s | 696 | 490 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.6 | 4.2 | 66.7% | 2 | 107.30s | 8,298 | 20,816 | 86,330 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 4.16s | 7,913 | 539 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 235.14s | 95,366 | 29,960 | 91,357 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 3.2 | 9.1 | 0.0% | 0 | 83.13s | 65,572 | 13,744 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.83s | 8,016 | 1,507 | 4,078 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 2.06s | 7,788 | 248 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 274.59s | 837 | 118,155 | 260,533 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 2.79s | 798 | 25 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 11.47s | 546 | 10 | 2,835 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 5.2 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.07s | 522 | 72 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.82s | 744 | 324 | 1,374 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 6.2 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.92s | 711 | 49 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.9 | 7.8 | 88.9% | 1 | 32.80s | 747 | 4,505 | 31,642 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 5.15s | 714 | 639 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 24.17s | 8,221 | 884 | 6,373 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 9.5 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.74s | 10,881 | 339 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 40.69s | 228 | 1,378 | 11,066 | |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.03s | 210 | 11 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ling 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSolar Pro 4highGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsLing 3.1 FlashlowDots 3 Note PreviewlowTersedia gratisvsQwen3.6 27BnoneDots 3 Note PreviewhighTersedia gratisvsQwen3.6 27BnoneGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneQwen3.6 27BnonevsSolar Pro 4highQwen3.6 27BnonevsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemini 3.5 FlashminimalvsQwen3.6 27Bnone