- Peringkat
- #314
- Total token output
- 110,071
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 14.02s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Jev 1.13
Ling 3.0 Tiny unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.0 vs 3.2. Ling 3.0 Tiny memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.003. Jev 1.13 lebih cepat di 698ms vs 14.02s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 9.1% vs 27.3%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #328
- Total token output
- 18,927
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 698ms
- Total Biaya
- $0.003
Model yang direkomendasikan
Ling 3.0 Tiny
It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny none | Jev 1.13 Jev 1.13 none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Peringkat | #314 | #328 |
| Keandalan | 9.8 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 10.0 | 5.5 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 36/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 9.1% | 27.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 0 | 0 |
| Total Run | 66 | 36 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.000 | 0.047 |
| Total Biaya | $0.000 | $0.003 |
| Harga input | $0.000 / 1M | $0.042 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 184,579 | 67,092 |
| Token output | 110,071 | 18,927 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 14.02s | 698ms |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 240.61s | 1.08s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 294.46s | 8.38s |
| Parameter | 7.9B total (1.3B aktif) | - |
| Ketersediaan | Sumber terbuka | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#314 Ling 3.0 Tiny
none
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 334.1s
- Token
- 32,913 tok
#328 Jev 1.13
none
Belum ada hasil showcase yang dihasilkan untuk model ini.
- Biaya
- T/A
- Waktu
- -
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 4.8 | 10.0 | 25.0% | 0 | 5.14s | 762 | 1,191 | 0 | |
| Jev 1.13 | 4.0 | 7.5 | 25.0% | 0 | 853ms | 11,544 | 5,037 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 4.2 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.19s | 8,307 | 798 | 0 | |
| Jev 1.13 | 2.2 | 6.7 | 0.0% | 0 | 598ms | 30,072 | 8,130 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 124.21s | 159,400 | 107,192 | 0 | |
| Jev 1.13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.14s | 8,022 | 306 | 0 | |
| Jev 1.13 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 799ms | 14,229 | 2,763 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 880ms | 654 | 18 | 0 | |
| Jev 1.13 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 632ms | 5,526 | 1,245 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.4 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.07s | 549 | 141 | 0 | |
| Jev 1.13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.44s | 750 | 72 | 0 | |
| Jev 1.13 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 557ms | 4,527 | 1,641 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.64s | 756 | 215 | 0 | |
| Jev 1.13 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 33.3% | 0 | 573ms | 1,194 | 111 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 3.05s | 5,148 | 126 | 0 | |
| Jev 1.13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 988ms | 231 | 12 | 0 | |
| Jev 1.13 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Ling 3.0 TinynonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumLing 3.0 TinynonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 3.0 TinynonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumLing 3.0 TinynonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLing 3.0 TinymediumvsJev 1.13noneQwen3.5-9BmediumvsJev 1.13noneGranite 4.2 8BhighvsLing 3.0 TinynoneLing 3.0 TinylowvsJev 1.13noneLing 3.0 TinyhighvsJev 1.13noneCobuddymediumvsLing 3.0 TinynoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsLing 3.0 TinynoneLing 3.0 TinynonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratis