Navigasi
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Granite 4.2 8B (high) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

Granite 4.2 8B (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.6 vs 4.0. Ling 3.0 Tiny memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.084. Ling 3.0 Tiny lebih cepat di 14.02s vs 235.89s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 39.4% vs 9.1%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-08

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#293
Total token output
612,215
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
235.89s
Total Biaya
$0.084
Peringkat
#308
Total token output
110,071
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
14.02s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan Granite 4.2 8B (high)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B high Rilis: 2026-09-02 Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny none Rilis: 2026-08-07
Skor 4.6 4.0
Peringkat #293 #308
Keandalan 7.6 9.8
Konsistensi 6.3 10.0
Percobaan 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 39.4% 9.1%
Tes tidak stabil 10 0
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 2.085 0.000
Total Biaya $0.084 $0.000
Harga input $0.100 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Harga output $0.150 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total token input 43,278 184,579
Token output 181,083 110,071
Token penalaran 431,132 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 235.89s 14.02s
Waktu respons (maks) 685.87s 240.61s
Waktu respons (total) 5189.64s 294.46s
Parameter 8B 7.9B total (1.3B aktif)
Ketersediaan Sumber terbuka Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#293 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B

high
Provider returned error
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.2s
Token
0 tok

#308 Ling 3.0 Tiny

none
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
334.1s
Token
32,913 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Granite 4.2 8B 3.8 4.3 33.3% 2 515.34s 7,047 42,438 154,749
Ling 3.0 Tiny 4.2 10.0 0.0% 0 1.19s 8,307 798 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan