Navigasi
Advertise here

Cobuddy (medium) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

Cobuddy (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.7 vs 4.0. Biaya benchmark hampir imbang di $0.000 vs $0.000. Ling 3.0 Tiny lebih cepat di 14.02s vs 39.90s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 45.5% vs 9.1%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-23

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#321
Total token output
118,380
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
39.90s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Peringkat
#338
Total token output
110,071
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
14.02s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan Cobuddy (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Rilis: 2026-05-06 Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny none Rilis: 2026-08-07
Skor 4.7 4.0
Peringkat #321 #338
Keandalan 10.0 9.8
Konsistensi 7.2 10.0
Percobaan 63/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 45.5% 9.1%
Tes tidak stabil 6 0
Total Run 63 66
Biaya per hasil 0.000 0.000
Total Biaya $0.000 $0.000
Harga input $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Harga output $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total token input 37,449 184,579
Token output 1,677 110,071
Token penalaran 116,703 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 39.90s 14.02s
Waktu respons (maks) 309.02s 240.61s
Waktu respons (total) 797.98s 294.46s
Parameter ~21B total (~3B aktif) 7.9B total (1.3B aktif)
Ketersediaan Tertutup Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#321 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.1s
Token
0 tok

#338 Ling 3.0 Tiny

none
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
334.1s
Token
32,913 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Ling 3.0 Tiny 4.2 10.0 0.0% 0 1.19s 8,307 798 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

CobuddymediumvsMercury 2noneCobuddymediumvsGranite 4.2 8BhighTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneCobuddymediumvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsGPT-5.4 NanononeCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratisCobuddymediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1TnoneCobuddymediumvsHy4 previewnoneCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3 SupernoneTersedia gratis