Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Cobuddy vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

Ringkasan

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 4.9 vs 4.9. Cobuddy (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.037. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 lebih cepat di 6.99s vs 39.90s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 47.6% vs 38.1%.

Model yang direkomendasikanKAT-Coder-Air V2.5It has the best score here (4.9), while responding about 5.7x faster than Cobuddy (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14

Metrik Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Rilis: 2026-05-06 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 none Rilis: 2026-07-14
Skor 4.9 4.9
Peringkat #167 #168
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 7.5 7.1
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 47.6% 38.1%
Tes tidak stabil 6 7
Total Run 63 63
Biaya per hasil 0.000 0.724
Total Biaya $0.000 $0.037
Harga input $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Harga output $0.000 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total token input 37,449 41,328
Token output 1,677 49,933
Token penalaran 116,703 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 39.90s 6.99s
Waktu respons (maks) 309.02s 24.94s
Waktu respons (total) 797.98s 146.78s

Showcase generasi

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#167 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.1s
Token
0 tok

#168 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

none
Biaya
$0.002
Waktu
14.5s
Token
2,619 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.3 9.6 0.0% 0 14.31s 6,472 16,918 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan