- Peringkat
- #260
- Total token output
- 118,380
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 39.90s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Cobuddy (medium) vs Ling-2.6-flash
Ling-2.6-flash unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.9 vs 4.7. Cobuddy (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.002. Ling-2.6-flash lebih cepat di 10.71s vs 39.90s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 45.5% vs 30.3%.
- Peringkat
- #247
- Total token output
- 14,903
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 10.71s
- Total Biaya
- $0.002
Model yang direkomendasikan
Ling-2.6-flash
It has the best score here (4.9), while responding about 3.7x faster than Cobuddy (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Cobuddy Cobuddy medium | Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 4.7 | 4.9 |
| Peringkat | #260 | #247 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Konsistensi | 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Percobaan | 63/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 45.5% | 30.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 2 |
| Total Run | 63 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.000 | 0.024 |
| Total Biaya | $0.000 | $0.002 |
| Harga input | $0.000 / 1M | $0.010 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.000 / 1M | $0.030 / 1M |
| Total token input | 37,449 | 114,384 |
| Token output | 1,677 | 14,903 |
| Token penalaran | 116,703 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 39.90s | 10.71s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 309.02s | 36.03s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 797.98s | 214.28s |
| Parameter | ~21B total (~3B aktif) | 104B total (7.4B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#260 Cobuddy
medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 0.1s
- Token
- 0 tok
#247 Ling-2.6-flash
none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 0.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 8.7 | 7.9 | 91.7% | 1 | 10.00s | 453 | 98 | 4,666 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.7 | 6.7 | 22.2% | 1 | 79.17s | 4,726 | 358 | 30,138 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 47.38s | 18,324 | 465 | 7,265 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 17.36s | 8,181 | 275 | 5,591 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 128.15s | 540 | 10 | 49,454 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 4.2 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 23.23s | 498 | 76 | 3,782 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.60s | 508 | 64 | 2,842 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 12.83s | 561 | 189 | 5,808 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.19s | 3,505 | 133 | 294 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobuddy | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 36.98s | 153 | 9 | 6,863 | |
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
CobuddymediumvsMercury 2noneLing-2.6-flashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratisTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsLing-2.6-flashnoneTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneCobuddymediumvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsGPT-5.4 NanononeLing-2.6-flashnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowTersedia gratisCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratisCobuddymediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1Tnone