Navigasi
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Tiny vs GLM 4.7 Flash (medium)

GLM 4.7 Flash (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.3 vs 4.0. Ling 3.0 Tiny memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.168. Ling 3.0 Tiny lebih cepat di 14.02s vs 134.34s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 9.1% vs 31.8%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-22

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#327
Total token output
110,071
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
14.02s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Peringkat
#319
Total token output
419,534
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
134.34s
Total Biaya
$0.168
Model yang direkomendasikan GLM 4.7 Flash (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny none Rilis: 2026-08-07 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium Rilis: 2026-01-19
Skor 4.0 4.3
Peringkat #327 #319
Keandalan 9.8 8.6
Konsistensi 10.0 7.0
Percobaan 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 9.1% 31.8%
Tes tidak stabil 0 8
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.000 4.180
Total Biaya $0.000 $0.168
Harga input $0.000 / 1M $0.061 / 1M
Harga output $0.000 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total token input 184,579 79,104
Token output 110,071 42,254
Token penalaran 0 377,280
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 14.02s 134.34s
Waktu respons (maks) 240.61s 1539.97s
Waktu respons (total) 294.46s 2015.13s
Parameter 7.9B total (1.3B aktif) 30B total (3B aktif)
Ketersediaan Sumber terbuka Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#327 Ling 3.0 Tiny

none
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
334.1s
Token
32,913 tok

#319 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
186.2s
Token
12,112 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Ling 3.0 Tiny 4.2 10.0 0.0% 0 1.19s 8,307 798 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.2 7.4 11.1% 1 55.33s 3,106 4,981 22,387

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Granite 4.2 8BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGrok 4.20nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 3.0 TinynonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisvsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGranite 4.1 8BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGranite 4.2 8BhighvsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneTersedia gratisvsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMercury 2nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMercury 2.5nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 3.0 TinyhighvsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumTrinity Large PreviewnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumKAT-Coder-Air V2.5nonevsGLM 4.7 Flashmedium