Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 8.1 vs 8.0. Step 3.7 Flash (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.515 vs $0.584. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) lebih cepat di 9.48s vs 26.37s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 81.8% vs 72.7%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)It has the best score here (8.1), while responding about 2.8x faster than Step 3.7 Flash (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-21

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Rilis: 2026-07-21 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash medium Rilis: 2026-05-29
Skor 8.1 8.0
Peringkat #31 #33
Keandalan 10.0 9.9
Konsistensi 7.5 8.9
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 81.8% 72.7%
Tes tidak stabil 7 3
Total Run 66 64
Biaya per hasil 4.169 3.676
Total Biaya $0.584 $0.515
Harga input $0.300 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Harga output $2.500 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total token input 105,138 114,062
Token output 8,315 427,572
Token penalaran 212,507 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 9.48s 26.37s
Waktu respons (maks) 43.93s 152.83s
Waktu respons (total) 208.52s 580.25s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Biaya
$0.023
Waktu
23.6s
Token
9,128 tok

#33 Step 3.7 Flash

medium
Biaya
$0.006
Waktu
46.2s
Token
4,466 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
Step 3.7 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 27.42s 7,437 44,797 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan