Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 8.1 vs 8.0. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.584 vs $0.604. GPT-5.2 Chat lebih cepat di 7.65s vs 9.48s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 81.8% vs 74.2%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGPT-5.2 ChatIt has the strongest score in this comparison (8.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-21

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Rilis: 2026-07-21 GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Rilis: 2025-12-11
Skor 8.1 8.0
Peringkat #31 #34
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 7.5 8.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 81.8% 74.2%
Tes tidak stabil 7 4
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 4.169 4.308
Total Biaya $0.584 $0.604
Harga input $0.300 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Harga output $2.500 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total token input 105,138 101,248
Token output 8,315 30,424
Token penalaran 212,507 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 9.48s 7.65s
Waktu respons (maks) 43.93s 38.52s
Waktu respons (total) 208.52s 168.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Biaya
$0.023
Waktu
23.6s
Token
9,128 tok

#34 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Biaya
$0.010
Waktu
15.3s
Token
797 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan