#21 Seed-2.0-Lite
medium- Biaya
- $0.005
- Waktu
- 86.7s
- Token
- 2,354 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
Ringkasan
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 8.5 vs 8.5. Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.175 vs $0.376. Step 3.7 Flash (medium) lebih cepat di 20.35s vs 47.07s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 76.2% vs 73.0%.
Model yang direkomendasikanSeed-2.0-Lite (medium)It has the best score here (8.5), while costing about 2.1x less than Step 3.7 Flash (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite medium | Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Peringkat | #21 | #23 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.9 |
| Konsistensi | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 76.2% | 73.0% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 2 |
| Total Run | 63 | 61 |
| Biaya per hasil | 1.250 | 2.686 |
| Total Biaya | $0.175 | $0.376 |
| Harga input | $0.250 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga output | $2.000 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| Total token input | 46,740 | 39,981 |
| Token output | 3,230 | 319,958 |
| Token penalaran | 78,406 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 47.07s | 20.35s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 254.92s | 113.98s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 988.37s | 427.42s |
Showcase generasi
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#23 Step 3.7 Flash
medium- Biaya
- $0.006
- Waktu
- 46.2s
- Token
- 4,466 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed-2.0-Lite | 8.0 | 9.8 | 66.7% | 0 | 156.74s | 8,247 | 458 | 31,890 | |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 8.8 | 7.8 | 88.9% | 1 | 27.42s | 7,437 | 44,797 | 0 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Seed-2.0-LitemediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsStep 3.7 FlashmediumDeepSeek V4 FlashhighvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsDeepSeek V4 FlashhighGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsGPT-5.6 TerrahighStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2highSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsGLM 5.2highKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5lowSeed-2.0-LitemediumvsGrok 4.5low