Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GLM 5.2 (medium) vs GLM 5 (medium)

GLM 5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.176 vs $0.307. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 33.54s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 78.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#49
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.176
Rank
#54
Total Output Tokens
124,566
Response Time (avg)
33.54s
Total Cost
$0.307
Recommended model GLM 5.2 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 1.7x less than GLM 5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 7.8 7.7
Rank #49 #54
Reliability 9.5 10.0
Consistency 8.0 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 78.8%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 2.159 1.668
Total Cost $0.176 $0.307
Input Price $0.761 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $2.389 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,199 35,224
Output Tokens 12,261 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 49,500 102,996
Response Time (avg) 23.28s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 101.36s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 488.94s 435.99s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#49 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

#54 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair