Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.213 vs $1.017. GPT-5.6 Luna (high) is faster at 18.68s vs 23.28s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2 (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 4.8x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna high Release: 2026-07-09 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #42 #36
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 8.9 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 6.780 2.159
Total Cost $1.017 $0.213
Input Price $1.000 / 1M $0.919 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $2.887 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 80,918 37,199
Output Tokens 5,088 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 150,910 49,500
Response Time (avg) 18.68s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 111.09s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 411.05s 488.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#42 GPT-5.6 Luna

high
Cost
$0.033
Time
34.2s
Tokens
5,484 tok

#36 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 4.7 55.6% 2 15.63s 7,302 510 17,746
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair