Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Z.ai: GLM 5

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. GLM 5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.372 vs $1.017. GPT-5.6 Luna (high) is faster at 18.68s vs 33.54s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 78.8%.

Recommended modelGLM 5 (medium)It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 2.7x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna high Release: 2026-07-09 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #42 #40
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 78.8%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 6.780 1.668
Total Cost $1.017 $0.372
Input Price $1.000 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $3.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 80,918 35,224
Output Tokens 5,088 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 150,910 102,996
Response Time (avg) 18.68s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 111.09s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 411.05s 435.99s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#42 GPT-5.6 Luna

high
Cost
$0.033
Time
34.2s
Tokens
5,484 tok

#40 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 4.7 55.6% 2 15.63s 7,302 510 17,746
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair