Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Pro (high) vs GLM 5 (medium)

GLM 5 (medium) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.7. DeepSeek V4 Pro (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.200 vs $0.307. GLM 5 (medium) is faster at 33.54s vs 79.14s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 78.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#58
Total Output Tokens
189,181
Response Time (avg)
79.14s
Total Cost
$0.200
Rank
#54
Total Output Tokens
124,566
Response Time (avg)
33.54s
Total Cost
$0.307
Recommended model GLM 5 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.7), while responding about 2.4x faster than DeepSeek V4 Pro (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek V4 Pro high Release: 2026-04-24 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #58 #54
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 78.8%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 2.000 1.668
Total Cost $0.200 $0.307
Input Price $0.435 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $0.870 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,748 35,224
Output Tokens 10,462 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 178,719 102,996
Response Time (avg) 79.14s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 416.76s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 1740.97s 435.99s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#58 DeepSeek V4 Pro

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
257.6s
Tokens
14,870 tok

#54 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 6.3 8.7 33.3% 0 243.00s 5,090 383 84,580
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair