Navigate
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Pro (high) vs GLM 5 (medium)

GLM 5 (medium) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.7. GLM 5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.228 vs $0.454. GLM 5 (medium) is faster at 33.54s vs 92.50s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 78.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#95
Total Output Tokens
209,444
Response Time (avg)
92.50s
Total Cost
$0.454
Rank
#92
Total Output Tokens
124,566
Response Time (avg)
33.54s
Total Cost
$0.228
Recommended model GLM 5 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 2.0x less than DeepSeek V4 Pro (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek V4 Pro high Release: 2026-04-24 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #95 #92
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 8.1
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 78.8%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 2.251 1.668
Total Cost $0.454 $0.228
Input Price $0.956 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Output Price $1.911 / 1M $1.920 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,757 35,224
Output Tokens 22,928 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 186,516 102,996
Response Time (avg) 92.50s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 416.76s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 2035.01s 435.99s
Parameters 1.6T total (49B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 DeepSeek V4 Pro

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
257.6s
Tokens
14,870 tok

#92 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro 6.3 8.7 33.3% 0 243.00s 5,090 383 84,580
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair