Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.6 (medium) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. DeepSeek V4 Pro (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.200 vs $3.059. Claude Opus 4.6 (medium) is faster at 34.27s vs 79.14s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#55
Total Output Tokens
100,601
Response Time (avg)
34.27s
Total Cost
$3.059
Rank
#58
Total Output Tokens
189,181
Response Time (avg)
79.14s
Total Cost
$0.200
Recommended model DeepSeek V4 Pro (high)

It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 15.3x less than Claude Opus 4.6 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-05 DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek V4 Pro high Release: 2026-04-24
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #55 #58
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 63.6%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 23.524 2.000
Total Cost $3.059 $0.200
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,615 90,748
Output Tokens 72,286 10,462
Reasoning Tokens 28,315 178,719
Response Time (avg) 34.27s 79.14s
Response Time (max) 151.51s 416.76s
Response Time (total) 513.99s 1740.97s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#55 Claude Opus 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#58 DeepSeek V4 Pro

high
Cost
$0.023
Time
257.6s
Tokens
14,870 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 5.7 7.1 44.4% 1 30.10s 8,522 13,057 4,121
DeepSeek V4 Pro 6.3 8.7 33.3% 0 243.00s 5,090 383 84,580

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair