Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.6 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

Qwen3.7 Flash (high) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $3.059. Claude Opus 4.6 (medium) is faster at 34.27s vs 39.77s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 72.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#51
Total Output Tokens
100,601
Response Time (avg)
34.27s
Total Cost
$3.059
Rank
#48
Total Output Tokens
359,703
Response Time (avg)
39.77s
Total Cost
$0.051
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 60.9x less than Claude Opus 4.6 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-05 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #51 #48
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 72.7%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 23.524 0.387
Total Cost $3.059 $0.051
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,615 116,322
Output Tokens 72,286 12,332
Reasoning Tokens 28,315 347,371
Response Time (avg) 34.27s 39.77s
Response Time (max) 151.51s 431.47s
Response Time (total) 513.99s 875.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#51 Claude Opus 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#48 Qwen3.7 Flash

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 5.7 7.1 44.4% 1 30.10s 8,522 13,057 4,121
Qwen3.7 Flash 8.2 9.7 66.7% 0 58.84s 7,893 503 62,350

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair