Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Opus 4.8 (low) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $2.077. Claude Opus 4.8 (low) is faster at 12.74s vs 39.77s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 72.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#49
Total Output Tokens
51,758
Response Time (avg)
12.74s
Total Cost
$2.077
Rank
#48
Total Output Tokens
359,703
Response Time (avg)
39.77s
Total Cost
$0.051
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 41.3x less than Claude Opus 4.8 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 low Release: 2026-05-28 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #49 #48
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 72.7%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 12.979 0.387
Total Cost $2.077 $0.051
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 156,525 116,322
Output Tokens 43,141 12,332
Reasoning Tokens 8,617 347,371
Response Time (avg) 12.74s 39.77s
Response Time (max) 127.97s 431.47s
Response Time (total) 280.29s 875.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#49 Claude Opus 4.8

low
Cost
$0.031
Time
14.1s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#48 Qwen3.7 Flash

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 7.58s 10,590 3,637 809
Qwen3.7 Flash 8.2 9.7 66.7% 0 58.84s 7,893 503 62,350

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair