Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.8 (low) vs Qwen3.8 27B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. Local hardware cost was not measured, so cost comparisons are unavailable. Claude Opus 4.8 (low) is faster at 12.88s vs 33.05s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#70
Total Output Tokens
52,237
Response Time (avg)
12.88s
Total Cost
$2.089
Rank
#68
Total Output Tokens
136,162
Response Time (avg)
33.05s
Total Cost
N/A
Recommended model Claude Opus 4.8 (low)

It has the best score here (7.8), while responding about 2.6x faster than Qwen3.8 27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 low Release: 2026-05-28 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B medium Release: 2026-08-14
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #70 #68
Reliability 10.0 9.6
Consistency 8.9 9.7
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 66.7%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 13.054 N/A
Total Cost $2.089 N/A
Input Price $5.000 / 1M N/A
Output Price $25.000 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 156,522 98,266
Output Tokens 43,056 1,861
Reasoning Tokens 9,181 134,301
Response Time (avg) 12.88s 33.05s
Response Time (max) 127.97s 214.63s
Response Time (total) 283.32s 694.04s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#70 Claude Opus 4.8

low
Cost
$0.031
Time
14.1s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#68 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Cost
N/A
Time
43.4s
Tokens
2,956 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 7.58s 10,590 3,637 809
Qwen3.8 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.50s 7,893 585 26,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair