AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com
#151

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen Release: 2026-08-14 Tested on: 2026-10-01 05:03 qwen/qwen3.8-27b::medium
27.3BOtherWeights available
(high) (medium) (low) (none)

Summary

Qwen3.8 27B scores 7.2 on AI BENCHY and ranks #151. It has 9.7 reliability, a 66.7% pass rate, ~$0.073 total cost, and 40.09s average response time.

What makes Qwen3.8 27B unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while Tool Calling is its weakest area at #17. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-14

Reported
Parameters
27.3B
Architecture
Other
Availability
Weights available
License
Apache-2.0

Exact local Q4_K_M GGUF reports 27.3B parameters and a hybrid attention/SSM architecture through Ollama model details. Tested locally on an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090.

Score

7.2

Consistency

9.4

Total Cost (Current Price)

~$0.073

Total Output Tokens

170,696

Total Input Tokens

277,164

Estimated benchmark electricity cost

~$0.073

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 9

Attempt pass rate: 66.7%

Flaky tests

2

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

40.09s

Response Time (max): 214.63s

Response Time (total): 881.89s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#151 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
43.4s
Tokens
2,956 tok

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Quick Compare

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Agentic 4.7 1.6
Anti-AI Tricks 10.0 10.0
Coding 10.0 10.0
Combined 8.7 6.9
Data parsing and extraction 6.5 10.0
Domain specific 5.3 10.0
General Intelligence 5.0 10.0
Instructions following 10.0 10.0
Puzzle Solving 8.3 10.0
Tool Calling 3.0 10.0
Trivia 3.0 10.0

Compared models