Navigate
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (medium) vs Qwen3.8 27B (medium)

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (medium) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. Qwen3.8 27B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.073 vs $0.440. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (medium) is faster at 8.68s vs 40.09s, with pass rates of 76.8% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-11-13

Compared models

Rank
#205
Total Output Tokens
129,214
Response Time (avg)
8.68s
Total Cost
$0.440
Rank
#209
Total Output Tokens
170,696
Response Time (avg)
40.09s
Total Cost
~$0.073
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.2 vs 7.3), while costing about 6.0x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite medium Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B medium Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available
Score 7.3 7.2
Rank #205 #209
Reliability 10.0 9.7
Consistency 7.6 9.4
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.8% 66.7%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 3.140 ~0.520
Total Cost $0.440 ~$0.073
Input Price $0.300 / 1M N/A
Output Price $2.500 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price $0.030 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price $0.084 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 388,307 277,164
Output Tokens 10,412 1,913
Reasoning Tokens 118,802 168,783
Response Time (avg) 8.68s 40.09s
Response Time (max) 86.92s 214.63s
Response Time (total) 199.65s 881.89s
Parameters ~150B total (~10B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#205 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

medium
Cost
$0.010
Time
17.8s
Tokens
4,000 tok

#209 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
43.4s
Tokens
2,956 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 7.9 9.9 66.7% 0 9.96s 8,122 471 28,930
Qwen3.8 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.50s 7,893 585 26,808

Switch Comparison Pair

Gemini 3.8 FlashlowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsLongCat 2.0highClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableNex-N2.6highvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsQwen3.5-27BnoneGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsNex-N2.6highQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailablevsStep 3.7 FlashlowGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashhighClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableLongCat 2.0highvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumGemini 3.5 Flash LitemediumvsQwen3.7 Flashhigh