Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.5. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.090 vs $0.369. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.76s vs 6.01s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 40.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-27BIt has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 4.1x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.5 6.5
Rank #104 #109
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 40.9%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.074 0.763
Total Cost $0.369 $0.090
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $2.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,818 102,316
Output Tokens 11,677 24,321
Reasoning Tokens 121,611 0
Response Time (avg) 6.01s 4.76s
Response Time (max) 49.03s 69.46s
Response Time (total) 132.30s 104.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.015
Time
16.4s
Tokens
5,971 tok

#109 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 8.37s 8,136 452 25,999
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair