Navigate
Advertise here

Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) vs Qwen3.5-27B

The average score is effectively tied at 7.2 vs 7.2. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.116 vs $0.323. Gemini 3.8 Flash (low) is faster at 7.54s vs 9.98s, with pass rates of 81.2% vs 47.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#142
Total Output Tokens
42,741
Response Time (avg)
7.54s
Total Cost
$0.323
Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
36,422
Response Time (avg)
9.98s
Total Cost
$0.116
Recommended model Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.8 Flash Gemini 3.8 Flash low Release: 2026-09-02 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.2 7.2
Rank #142 #139
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.4
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 81.2% 47.8%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 2.014 1.153
Total Cost $0.323 $0.116
Input Price $0.750 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $3.750 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 215,836 283,977
Output Tokens 9,452 36,422
Reasoning Tokens 33,289 0
Response Time (avg) 7.54s 9.98s
Response Time (max) 67.18s 124.53s
Response Time (total) 173.36s 229.52s
Parameters ~500B total (~20B active) 27B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#142 Gemini 3.8 Flash

low
Cost
$0.030
Time
45.8s
Tokens
8,023 tok

#139 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.8 Flash 5.4 7.2 44.4% 1 4.31s 8,118 449 5,706
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair