Navigate
Advertise here

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 27B (medium)

Qwen3.8 27B (medium) leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.1. Qwen3.8 27B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.073 vs $2.766. Claude Opus 5 is faster at 10.78s vs 40.09s, with pass rates of 55.1% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#149
Total Output Tokens
31,386
Response Time (avg)
10.78s
Total Cost
$2.766
Rank
#141
Total Output Tokens
170,696
Response Time (avg)
40.09s
Total Cost
~$0.073
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B (medium)

It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 38.1x less than Claude Opus 5.

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 none Release: 2026-07-25 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B medium Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available
Score 7.1 7.2
Rank #149 #141
Reliability 10.0 9.7
Consistency 9.6 9.4
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 55.1% 66.7%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 23.044 ~0.520
Total Cost $2.766 ~$0.073
Input Price $5.000 / 1M N/A
Output Price $25.000 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 396,120 277,164
Output Tokens 31,386 1,913
Reasoning Tokens 0 168,783
Response Time (avg) 10.78s 40.09s
Response Time (max) 79.61s 214.63s
Response Time (total) 247.96s 881.89s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Claude Opus 5

none
Cost
$0.271
Time
149.3s
Tokens
10,962 tok

#141 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
43.4s
Tokens
2,956 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 5.9 9.7 33.3% 0 5.54s 10,590 2,886 0
Qwen3.8 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.50s 7,893 585 26,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair