Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Opus 5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

GLM 5 (medium) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.5. GLM 5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.307 vs $1.550. Claude Opus 5 is faster at 7.60s vs 33.54s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 78.8%.

Recommended modelGLM 5 (medium)It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 5.0x less than Claude Opus 5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 none Release: 2026-07-25 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 7.5 7.7
Rank #59 #49
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 78.8%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 12.912 1.668
Total Cost $1.550 $0.307
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 185,550 35,224
Output Tokens 24,866 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 0 102,996
Response Time (avg) 7.60s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 47.72s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 167.28s 435.99s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#59 Claude Opus 5

none
Cost
$0.271
Time
149.3s
Tokens
10,962 tok

#49 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 5.9 9.7 33.3% 0 5.54s 10,590 2,886 0
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair