Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Flash (high) vs GLM 5 (medium)

Qwen3.7 Flash (high) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $0.307. GLM 5 (medium) is faster at 33.54s vs 39.77s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 78.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#48
Total Output Tokens
359,703
Response Time (avg)
39.77s
Total Cost
$0.051
Rank
#50
Total Output Tokens
124,566
Response Time (avg)
33.54s
Total Cost
$0.307
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 6.1x less than GLM 5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-07-28 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 7.8 7.7
Rank #48 #50
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.8 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 78.8%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 0.387 1.668
Total Cost $0.051 $0.307
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $0.130 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 116,322 35,224
Output Tokens 12,332 21,570
Reasoning Tokens 347,371 102,996
Response Time (avg) 39.77s 33.54s
Response Time (max) 431.47s 99.85s
Response Time (total) 875.01s 435.99s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#48 Qwen3.7 Flash

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#50 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 8.2 9.7 66.7% 0 58.84s 7,893 503 62,350
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair