Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) vs GLM 5 (medium)

GLM 5 (medium) leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.1. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.195 vs $0.479. GLM 5 (medium) is faster at 39.05s vs 102.66s, with pass rates of 72.5% vs 76.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#154
Total Output Tokens
621,056
Response Time (avg)
102.66s
Total Cost
~$0.195
Rank
#150
Total Output Tokens
138,257
Response Time (avg)
39.05s
Total Cost
$0.479
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.1 vs 7.2), while costing about 2.5x less than GLM 5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next xhigh Release: 2026-10-04 GLM 5 GLM 5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 7.1 7.2
Rank #154 #150
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.9 7.9
Attempts 69/69 66/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.5% 76.8%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 69 66
Cost per result ~1.390 2.552
Total Cost ~$0.195 $0.479
Input Price N/A $0.600 / 1M
Output Price N/A $1.920 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.120 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 301,749 212,440
Output Tokens 1,033 22,922
Reasoning Tokens 620,023 115,335
Response Time (avg) 102.66s 39.05s
Response Time (max) 674.08s 110.70s
Response Time (total) 2361.10s 546.68s
Parameters 180B total (6B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#154 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

xhigh
Cost
~$0.010
Time
333.1s
Tokens
30,654 tok

#150 GLM 5

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.7s
Tokens
2,068 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 7.4 7.0 77.8% 1 192.20s 8,235 122 186,070
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 74.30s 7,254 2,997 52,930

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Step 3.7 FlashlowvsGLM 5mediumQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5mediumClaude Opus 5nonevsGLM 5mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsGLM 5mediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumGemini 3.8 FlashlowvsGLM 5mediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.5mediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.5-27BnonevsGLM 5mediumLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.8 Flash Nextxhigh