Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) vs GLM 5.3 FlashX (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.1 vs 7.1. GLM 5.3 FlashX (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.114 vs ~$0.195. GLM 5.3 FlashX (medium) is faster at 7.37s vs 102.66s, with pass rates of 72.5% vs 69.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#154
Total Output Tokens
621,056
Response Time (avg)
102.66s
Total Cost
~$0.195
Rank
#155
Total Output Tokens
30,048
Response Time (avg)
7.37s
Total Cost
$0.114
Recommended model GLM 5.3 FlashX (medium)

It has the best score here (7.1), while costing about 1.7x less than Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next xhigh Release: 2026-10-04 GLM 5.3 FlashX GLM 5.3 FlashX medium Release: 2026-09-21
Score 7.1 7.1
Rank #154 #155
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.9 7.1
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.5% 69.6%
Flaky tests 6 8
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result ~1.390 0.946
Total Cost ~$0.195 $0.114
Input Price N/A $0.370 / 1M
Output Price N/A $1.250 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.090 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 301,749 205,100
Output Tokens 1,033 8,639
Reasoning Tokens 620,023 21,409
Response Time (avg) 102.66s 7.37s
Response Time (max) 674.08s 74.39s
Response Time (total) 2361.10s 169.54s
Parameters 180B total (6B active) 320B total (18B active)
Availability Weights available Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#154 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

xhigh
Cost
~$0.010
Time
333.1s
Tokens
30,654 tok

#155 GLM 5.3 FlashX

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
8.1s
Tokens
1,480 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 7.4 7.0 77.8% 1 192.20s 8,235 122 186,070
GLM 5.3 FlashX 6.0 4.6 66.7% 2 6.37s 7,317 384 5,562

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

MiMo-V2.6-FlashlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.5mediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5mediumLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighClaude Opus 5nonevsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighEmber-1lowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmedium