Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

LongCat 2.0 (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh)

LongCat 2.0 (medium) leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.1. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.195 vs $0.767. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) is faster at 102.66s vs 144.88s, with pass rates of 59.4% vs 72.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#149
Total Output Tokens
422,234
Response Time (avg)
144.88s
Total Cost
$0.767
Rank
#154
Total Output Tokens
621,056
Response Time (avg)
102.66s
Total Cost
~$0.195
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.1 vs 7.2), while costing about 3.9x less than LongCat 2.0 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 medium Release: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next xhigh Release: 2026-10-04
Score 7.2 7.1
Rank #149 #154
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.0 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.4% 72.5%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 4.942 ~1.390
Total Cost $0.767 ~$0.195
Input Price $0.300 / 1M N/A
Output Price $1.200 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price $0.006 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 287,669 301,749
Output Tokens 47,204 1,033
Reasoning Tokens 375,030 620,023
Response Time (avg) 144.88s 102.66s
Response Time (max) 939.52s 674.08s
Response Time (total) 3332.19s 2361.10s
Parameters 1.6T total (48B active) 180B total (6B active)
Availability Open source Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 LongCat 2.0

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
285.1s
Tokens
13,057 tok

#154 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

xhigh
Cost
~$0.010
Time
333.1s
Tokens
30,654 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 455.00s 7,419 533 214,143
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 7.4 7.0 77.8% 1 192.20s 8,235 122 186,070

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

LongCat 2.0mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.8lowvsLongCat 2.0mediumClaude Opus 5nonevsLongCat 2.0mediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumGemini 3.8 FlashlowvsLongCat 2.0mediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.5mediumLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.5-27BnoneQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5medium