Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.5 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.1 vs 7.1. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.130 vs ~$0.195. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) is faster at 49.20s vs 102.66s, with pass rates of 72.5% vs 69.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#154
Total Output Tokens
621,056
Response Time (avg)
102.66s
Total Cost
~$0.195
Rank
#157
Total Output Tokens
341,511
Response Time (avg)
49.20s
Total Cost
$0.130
Recommended model MiMo-V2.5 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.1), while costing about 1.5x less than Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next xhigh Release: 2026-10-04 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 7.1 7.1
Rank #154 #157
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.9 7.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.5% 69.6%
Flaky tests 6 7
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result ~1.390 3.491
Total Cost ~$0.195 $0.130
Input Price N/A $0.140 / 1M
Output Price N/A $0.280 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.003 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 301,749 259,664
Output Tokens 1,033 8,414
Reasoning Tokens 620,023 333,097
Response Time (avg) 102.66s 49.20s
Response Time (max) 674.08s 316.27s
Response Time (total) 2361.10s 1131.69s
Parameters 180B total (6B active) 310B total (15B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#154 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

xhigh
Cost
~$0.010
Time
333.1s
Tokens
30,654 tok

#157 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 7.4 7.0 77.8% 1 192.20s 8,235 122 186,070
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Qwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5mediumLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighEmber-1lowvsMiMo-V2.5mediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighClaude Opus 5nonevsMiMo-V2.5mediumClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsQwen3.8 Flash Nextxhigh