Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.1 vs 7.1. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.195 vs $0.200. MiMo-V2.6-Flash (low) is faster at 54.57s vs 102.66s, with pass rates of 72.5% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#154
Total Output Tokens
621,056
Response Time (avg)
102.66s
Total Cost
~$0.195
Rank
#156
Total Output Tokens
585,416
Response Time (avg)
54.57s
Total Cost
$0.200
Recommended model MiMo-V2.6-Flash (low)

It has the best score here (7.1), while responding about 1.9x faster than Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next xhigh Release: 2026-10-04 MiMo-V2.6-Flash MiMo-V2.6-Flash low Release: 2026-09-22
Score 7.1 7.1
Rank #154 #156
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.9 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.5% 66.7%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result ~1.390 1.666
Total Cost ~$0.195 $0.200
Input Price N/A $0.140 / 1M
Output Price N/A $0.280 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.003 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 301,749 256,428
Output Tokens 1,033 9,786
Reasoning Tokens 620,023 575,630
Response Time (avg) 102.66s 54.57s
Response Time (max) 674.08s 345.18s
Response Time (total) 2361.10s 1255.15s
Parameters 180B total (6B active) 309B total (15B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#154 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

xhigh
Cost
~$0.010
Time
333.1s
Tokens
30,654 tok

#156 MiMo-V2.6-Flash

low
Cost
$0.009
Time
167.2s
Tokens
29,794 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 7.4 7.0 77.8% 1 192.20s 8,235 122 186,070
MiMo-V2.6-Flash 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 10.97s 7,422 405 21,894

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

MiMo-V2.6-FlashlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5mediumKimi K2.7 CodemediumvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighClaude Opus 5nonevsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsQwen3.8 Flash Nextxhigh