Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

LongCat 2.0 (medium) leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. Step 3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.454 vs $0.478. Step 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 20.68s vs 136.64s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelStep 3.7 Flash (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while responding about 6.6x faster than LongCat 2.0 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 medium Release: 2026-07-20 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.4 7.3
Rank #64 #71
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.978 3.782
Total Cost $0.478 $0.454
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 97,315 103,833
Output Tokens 44,384 376,581
Reasoning Tokens 329,012 0
Response Time (avg) 136.64s 20.68s
Response Time (max) 939.52s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 3006.01s 455.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#64 LongCat 2.0

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
285.1s
Tokens
13,057 tok

#71 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 455.00s 7,419 533 214,143
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair