Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.3. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.437 vs $0.454. Step 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 20.68s vs 89.19s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelStep 3.7 Flash (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.5), while responding about 4.3x faster than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Release: 2026-02-15 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.5 7.3
Rank #65 #75
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 4 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.348 3.782
Total Cost $0.437 $0.454
Input Price $0.260 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 113,560 103,833
Output Tokens 9,823 376,581
Reasoning Tokens 250,881 0
Response Time (avg) 89.19s 20.68s
Response Time (max) 304.85s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 1337.92s 455.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#65 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

medium
Cost
$0.011
Time
125.5s
Tokens
7,040 tok

#75 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 6.6 7.1 44.4% 1 180.70s 6,950 420 80,595
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair