- Score
- 7.5 (+0.35 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s · 35.4% faster
Qwen
Release: 2026-07-28
Tested on: 2026-10-01 00:59
qwen/qwen3.7-flash::high
~35B total (~3B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Summary
Qwen3.7 Flash scores 7.2 on AI BENCHY and ranks #182. It has 10.0 reliability, a 71.0% pass rate, $0.063 total cost, and 45.48s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.7 Flash unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #4, while Agentic is its weakest area at #16. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It uses unusually many reasoning tokens, which can help explain its slower or more expensive runs.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.6 (+1.39 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 2.6% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 83.5% faster
- Score
- 8.3 (+1.08 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.047 · 24.5% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 18.07s · 60.3% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~35B total (~3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the released Flash-class architecture.
7.2
Consistency
7.6
10.0
$0.063
Total Output Tokens
409,818
Total Input Tokens
293,775
Input Price
$0.030 / 1M
Output Price
$0.130 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.006 / 1M
Cache Write Price
$0.039 / 1M
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
7
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#182 Qwen3.7 Flash
high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 600.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 00:59 Re-test | 7.2 | 10.0 | $0.063 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-28 09:10 Initial run | 7.8 | 10.0 | $0.051 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.030 / 1M | $0.130 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $0.030 / 1M | $0.130 / 1M | $0.006 / 1M | $0.039 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3.7 FlashhighvsClaude Opus 4.8lowQwen3.7 FlashhighvsLongCat 2.0mediumQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGemini 3.8 FlashlowQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5mediumQwen3.7 FlashhighvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableQwen3.7 FlashhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.7 FlashhighvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15mediumQwen3.7 FlashhighvsQwen3.6 27BmediumQwen3.7 FlashhighvsQwen3.5-27BnoneQwen3.7 FlashhighvsClaude Opus 5none
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 4.7 | 1.6 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 8.2 | 9.7 | |
| Combined | 6.9 | 5.9 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.1 | 3.4 | |
| Instructions following | 9.8 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.1 | 5.1 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |