Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Flash (high) vs Qwen3.8 27B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.2 vs 7.2. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.063 vs ~$0.073. Qwen3.8 27B (medium) is faster at 40.09s vs 45.48s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-11-13

Compared models

Rank
#212
Total Output Tokens
409,818
Response Time (avg)
45.48s
Total Cost
$0.063
Rank
#209
Total Output Tokens
170,696
Response Time (avg)
40.09s
Total Cost
~$0.073
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-07-28 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B medium Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available
Score 7.2 7.2
Rank #212 #209
Reliability 10.0 9.7
Consistency 7.6 9.4
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.0% 66.7%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.478 ~0.520
Total Cost $0.063 ~$0.073
Input Price $0.030 / 1M N/A
Output Price $0.130 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price $0.006 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price $0.039 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 293,775 277,164
Output Tokens 13,527 1,913
Reasoning Tokens 396,291 168,783
Response Time (avg) 45.48s 40.09s
Response Time (max) 431.47s 214.63s
Response Time (total) 1045.97s 881.89s
Parameters ~35B total (~3B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#212 Qwen3.7 Flash

high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#209 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
43.4s
Tokens
2,956 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 8.2 9.7 66.7% 0 58.84s 7,893 503 62,350
Qwen3.8 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.50s 7,893 585 26,808

Switch Comparison Pair

Gemini 3.8 FlashlowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighQwen3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5mediumGemini 3.8 FlashlowvsQwen3.7 FlashhighNex-N2.6highvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableQwen3.7 FlashhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailablevsStep 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableLongCat 2.0highvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree Available