- Score
- 7.5 (+0.94 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.000 · 100.0% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s · 43.3% faster
Qwen
Release: 2026-07-28
Tested on: 2026-10-01 00:58
qwen/qwen3.7-flash::medium
~35B total (~3B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Summary
Qwen3.7 Flash scores 6.6 on AI BENCHY and ranks #224. It has 10.0 reliability, a 62.3% pass rate, $0.076 total cost, and 51.80s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.7 Flash unique: It uses unusually many reasoning tokens, which can help explain its slower or more expensive runs.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.6 (+1.98 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 20.4% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 85.5% faster
- Score
- 8.3 (+1.67 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.047 · 38.3% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 18.07s · 65.1% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~35B total (~3B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Estimate from the released Flash-class architecture.
6.6
Consistency
7.3
10.0
$0.076
Total Output Tokens
514,925
Total Input Tokens
300,394
Input Price
$0.030 / 1M
Output Price
$0.130 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.006 / 1M
Cache Write Price
$0.039 / 1M
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
8
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#224 Qwen3.7 Flash
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 600.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 00:58 Re-test | 6.6 | 10.0 | $0.076 | Current run | |
| 2026-07-28 09:18 Initial run | 7.0 | 10.0 | $0.064 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.030 / 1M | $0.130 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $0.030 / 1M | $0.130 / 1M | $0.006 / 1M | $0.039 / 1M |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Qwen3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2noneQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsLongCat 2.0lowQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.5noneQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsMercury 2mediumQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashlowQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashhighQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsApodex 1.1 MinihighFree AvailableQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsBeam 1.0 501B A23BmediumQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsGPT-5.6 SolnoneQwen3.7 FlashmediumvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5low
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 5.2 | 3.2 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 6.2 | 6.9 | |
| Combined | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.5 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 5.8 | 2.7 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.1 | 5.1 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |