Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.9 vs 7.0. Qwen3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.064 vs $0.524. GPT-5.6 Sol is faster at 2.16s vs 45.90s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#94
Total Output Tokens
4,357
Response Time (avg)
2.16s
Total Cost
$0.524
Rank
#91
Total Output Tokens
462,623
Response Time (avg)
45.90s
Total Cost
$0.064
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

It has the best score here (7.0), while costing about 8.2x less than GPT-5.6 Sol.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol none Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.9 7.0
Rank #94 #91
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 65.2%
Flaky tests 3 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.761 0.636
Total Cost $0.524 $0.064
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 78,593 114,468
Output Tokens 4,357 12,786
Reasoning Tokens 0 449,837
Response Time (avg) 2.16s 45.90s
Response Time (max) 12.81s 593.64s
Response Time (total) 47.62s 1009.84s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#94 GPT-5.6 Sol

none
Cost
$0.116
Time
78.7s
Tokens
3,944 tok

#91 Qwen3.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Sol 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,302 390 0
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 46.78s 7,893 563 61,902

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair