Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

Qwen3.7 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 7.0 vs 6.9. Qwen3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.064 vs $0.544. GPT-5.5 is faster at 2.36s vs 45.90s, with pass rates of 56.1% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
4,915
Response Time (avg)
2.36s
Total Cost
$0.544
Rank
#91
Total Output Tokens
462,623
Response Time (avg)
45.90s
Total Cost
$0.064
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

It has the best score here (7.0), while costing about 8.6x less than GPT-5.5.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 none Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.9 7.0
Rank #98 #91
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 56.1% 65.2%
Flaky tests 3 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.945 0.636
Total Cost $0.544 $0.064
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 79,285 114,468
Output Tokens 4,915 12,786
Reasoning Tokens 0 449,837
Response Time (avg) 2.36s 45.90s
Response Time (max) 12.24s 593.64s
Response Time (total) 51.88s 1009.84s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#98 GPT-5.5

none
Cost
$0.090
Time
54.3s
Tokens
3,063 tok

#91 Qwen3.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,305 462 0
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 46.78s 7,893 563 61,902

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair