Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Mercury 2 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.0 vs 7.0. Qwen3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.064 vs $0.093. Mercury 2 (medium) is faster at 2.72s vs 45.90s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#88
Total Output Tokens
87,119
Response Time (avg)
2.72s
Total Cost
$0.093
Rank
#91
Total Output Tokens
462,623
Response Time (avg)
45.90s
Total Cost
$0.064
Recommended model Mercury 2 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.0), while responding about 16.9x faster than Qwen3.7 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Mercury 2 Mercury 2 medium Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.0 7.0
Rank #88 #91
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 65.2%
Flaky tests 3 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.928 0.636
Total Cost $0.093 $0.064
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $0.750 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 109,572 114,468
Output Tokens 10,313 12,786
Reasoning Tokens 76,806 449,837
Response Time (avg) 2.72s 45.90s
Response Time (max) 14.63s 593.64s
Response Time (total) 57.12s 1009.84s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#88 Mercury 2

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
2.1s
Tokens
1,702 tok

#91 Qwen3.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 8.2 7.7 77.8% 1 2.04s 7,065 296 11,328
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 46.78s 7,893 563 61,902

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair