Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 27B (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low)

Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low) leads on average score with 8.0 vs 7.2. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.045 vs ~$0.073. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low) is faster at 23.66s vs 40.09s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 79.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-19

Compared models

Rank
#170
Total Output Tokens
170,696
Response Time (avg)
40.09s
Total Cost
~$0.073
Rank
#114
Total Output Tokens
135,295
Response Time (avg)
23.66s
Total Cost
~$0.045
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low)

It has the best score here (8.0), while costing about 1.6x less than Qwen3.8 27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B medium Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next low Release: 2026-10-04
Score 7.2 8.0
Rank #170 #114
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 9.4 8.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 79.7%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result ~0.520 ~0.299
Total Cost ~$0.073 ~$0.045
Input Price N/A N/A
Output Price N/A N/A
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 277,164 342,163
Output Tokens 1,913 1,518
Reasoning Tokens 168,783 133,777
Response Time (avg) 40.09s 23.66s
Response Time (max) 214.63s 166.72s
Response Time (total) 881.89s 544.16s
Parameters 27.3B 180B total (6B active)
Availability Weights available Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#170 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
43.4s
Tokens
2,956 tok

#114 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

low
Cost
~$0.002
Time
47.2s
Tokens
5,270 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.50s 7,893 585 26,808
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 29.46s 8,127 397 24,147

Switch Comparison Pair

Gemini 3.8 FlashlowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableGemini 3.8 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.4 NanomediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowQwen3.8 Flash NextlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowNemotron 3 UltramediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.4 MinimediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailablevsStep 3.7 FlashlowGPT-5.6 LunahighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableLongCat 2.0highvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree Available