#96 Qwen3.8 Flash Next
low- Cost
- ~$0.002
- Time
- 47.2s
- Tokens
- 5,270 tok
Summary
Qwen3.8 Flash Next scores 8.0 on AI BENCHY and ranks #96. It has 10.0 reliability, a 79.7% pass rate, ~$0.045 total cost, and 23.66s average response time.
What makes Qwen3.8 Flash Next unique: It stands out most in Coding, where it ranks #1, while General Intelligence is its weakest area at #14.
Researched on 2026-10-04
Qwen reports a 125B MoE language core with 6B activated, plus 51B n-gram embeddings and 4B MTP. The 180B total sums those components; 6B is the activated language-core count, not all lookup/draft work. Public weights use the custom Qwen Community License 1.0. This benchmark uses the ISTA-DASLab GSQ-RCO IQ3_S GGUF through Strata 0.1.39 on a local RTX 3090, with vision disabled and a 65,536-token runtime context. The compression is a quantized version of the exact public checkpoint, not the managed Qwen3.8-Flash API model.
8.0
Consistency
8.0
10.0
~$0.045
Total Output Tokens
135,295
Total Input Tokens
342,163
Estimated benchmark electricity cost
~$0.045
Flaky tests
6
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 6.1 | 3.1 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 6.9 | 5.9 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 4.1 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.7 | 3.1 | |
| Instructions following | 9.8 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 8.7 | 7.8 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |