Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.5-27B (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 8.0. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.045 vs $1.135. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low) is faster at 23.66s vs 114.73s, with pass rates of 76.8% vs 79.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
635,288
Response Time (avg)
114.73s
Total Cost
$1.135
Rank
#96
Total Output Tokens
135,295
Response Time (avg)
23.66s
Total Cost
~$0.045
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (low)

It has the best score here (8.0), while costing about 25.3x less than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next low Release: 2026-10-04
Score 7.9 8.0
Rank #98 #96
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.9 8.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.8% 79.7%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 8.104 ~0.299
Total Cost $1.135 ~$0.045
Input Price $0.195 / 1M N/A
Output Price $1.560 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 288,919 342,163
Output Tokens 17,484 1,518
Reasoning Tokens 617,804 133,777
Response Time (avg) 114.73s 23.66s
Response Time (max) 1026.43s 166.72s
Response Time (total) 2638.74s 544.16s
Parameters 27B 180B total (6B active)
Availability Open source Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#98 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

#96 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

low
Cost
~$0.002
Time
47.2s
Tokens
5,270 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 29.46s 8,127 397 24,147

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Qwen3.5-27BmediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.5-27BmediumGemini 3.8 FlashmediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.4 NanomediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.6 TerralowvsQwen3.5-27BmediumQwen3.8 Flash NextlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowNemotron 3 UltramediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.4 MinimediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.6 LunahighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextlowGPT-5.6 LunahighvsQwen3.5-27BmediumLing 3.1 FlashhighvsQwen3.5-27Bmedium