- Rank
- #98
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,466
- Response Time (avg)
- 13.30s
- Total Cost
- $3.471
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) vs Qwen3.5-27B (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.9. Qwen3.5-27B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.135 vs $3.471. Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is faster at 13.30s vs 114.73s, with pass rates of 85.5% vs 76.8%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #96
- Total Output Tokens
- 635,288
- Response Time (avg)
- 114.73s
- Total Cost
- $1.135
Recommended model
Claude Fable 5.1 (high)
It has the best score here (7.9), while responding about 8.6x faster than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 Claude Fable 5.1 high | Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Rank | #98 | #96 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 85.5% | 76.8% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 6 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 18.264 | 8.104 |
| Total Cost | $3.471 | $1.135 |
| Input Price | $10.000 / 1M | $0.195 / 1M |
| Output Price | $50.000 / 1M | $1.560 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 144,676 | 288,919 |
| Output Tokens | 8,184 | 17,484 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 32,282 | 617,804 |
| Response Time (avg) | 13.30s | 114.73s |
| Response Time (max) | 40.17s | 1026.43s |
| Response Time (total) | 305.83s | 2638.74s |
| Parameters | ~9.5T total (~878B active) | 27B |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#98 Claude Fable 5.1
high- Cost
- $0.384
- Time
- 102.5s
- Tokens
- 7,824 tok
#96 Qwen3.5-27B
medium- Cost
- $0.008
- Time
- 62.0s
- Tokens
- 3,099 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 6.93s | 8,718 | 254 | 141 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 146.48s | 177,275 | 1,371 | 19,008 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.90s | 858 | 287 | 790 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 8.7 | 7.9 | 91.7% | 1 | 19.75s | 672 | 569 | 31,505 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 13.91s | 10,608 | 520 | 6,503 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 6.2 | 7.1 | 55.6% | 1 | 160.69s | 7,895 | 6,381 | 89,388 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 34.59s | 98,419 | 5,484 | 5,373 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 595.19s | 84,417 | 7,948 | 279,132 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.30s | 10,515 | 312 | 403 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 30.26s | 7,782 | 270 | 16,150 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 24.34s | 990 | 63 | 12,436 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 5.9 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 89.39s | 562 | 157 | 52,734 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.40s | 714 | 291 | 0 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 101.41s | 524 | 70 | 23,147 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.60s | 921 | 97 | 263 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 19.66s | 699 | 97 | 11,638 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.11s | 912 | 506 | 558 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 8.2 | 7.7 | 77.8% | 1 | 59.60s | 696 | 242 | 70,096 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.30s | 11,757 | 354 | 118 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.45s | 8,193 | 348 | 1,323 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 30.58s | 264 | 16 | 5,697 | |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 85.11s | 204 | 31 | 23,683 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Claude Fable 5.1highvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxQwen3.5-27BmediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.4 MinimediumGPT-5.6 TerralowvsQwen3.5-27BmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.7 MaxnoneClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.6 TerralowClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.8 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.4 NanomediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.5 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsNemotron 3 UltramediumFree AvailableGPT-5.6 LunahighvsQwen3.5-27Bmedium